![]() ![]() Separately, Chinese officials believed that the goal of the Zero-COVID policy was to put people’s lives, safety, and health first at the lowest social cost, in line with China’s actual conditions and science. Furthermore, due to prior experience and path dependence in decision making, the official perception of the Zero-COVID policy remained unchanged, regardless of the decline in the harmfulness of the virus itself. However, the emergence of more transmissible and harmful variants of the coronavirus in 2021 disincentivized China from lifting its special measures. Compared to the other major economies in 2020, China was the only country to report economic growth. ![]() Although the decision was internationally controversial, there is no doubt that the lockdown and precise epidemic prevention helped China temporarily shield itself from the pandemic’s impact on people’s livelihoods and the economy in the shortest possible time. An analysis of the “ 20 prevention and control measure to optimize COVID-19 responses,” the “10 new measures to optimize COVID-19 response,” and their subsequent removal will help to understand the significance of this policy change.Īt the beginning of the COVID outbreak in 2020, China implemented the first lockdown since the founding of the State, starting in Wuhan. As the world belatedly welcomes China back, it is important to look back at the series of policy changes from the implementation of the Zero-COVID policy pursued by the Chinese government over the past three years to its abrupt end. In December 2022, China abandoned its draconian Zero-COVID policy (also called Dynamic Zero-COVID Policy), a move that was one of the most dramatic shifts in its coronavirus prevention measures. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |